Skip to main content

Affirmative Action

What is it about affirmative action that makes people so angry? For hundreds of years, American minorities have not had the same rights as white men. Finally almost 500 years after Columbus landed, we got a law, the Civil Rights Law of 1964, which said we can not discriminate against race in employment. The term “affirmative action” was first used by President John F. Kennedy in creating the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1961 and required that projects receiving federal funds take “affirmative action” to ensure that employment decisions are free from racial discrimination. Slowly, the idea of affirmative action evolved to encompass programs that actively sought to increase the participation of racial minorities. We went so far as to say that we can consider race when students apply to college. Minorities got extra points in admissions. Think about it. We were not saying – take minorities that were not qualified. We were saying take them if they were. What happens? Some white guy who scores higher on a test says he should have been chosen and the courts agree. The test is man made – a white man’s test actually if you look at the makeup of testing companies. But just because you score higher on a test doesn’t mean you will make a good lawyer, accountant, doctor, etc. That is the fallacy of testing. But the courts bought it and we have lost much of affirmative action. Now we have retreated to - let’s provide affirmative action to the lower economic classes because that is race blind. Let’s consider class rather than race. The problem with that is that this country is not race blind. When I worked for NYS Division of Human Rights, I once asked an integrated group of middle-class, highly educated Division employees, how many had been discriminated in housing. Every minority raised their name; every white person did not. Blacks are discriminated against in this country even when they are middle- and upper class. There are numerous statistics that state time and time again that this country discriminates against the race of a person. In this country, an August 2003 Bureau of Justice Statistics analysis shows that 32% of black males born in 2001 expect to spend time in prison over the course of their lifetime. That is up from 13.4 percent in 1974 and 29.4 percent in 1991. By contrast, 17.2% of Hispanics and 5.9% of whites born in 2001 are likely to end up in prison. There are a greater proportion of minorities in community colleges rather than four year colleges where whites dominant. There are four black CEOs in Fortune 500 companies. At this rate it will take a hundred years to get any form of equity. Will they change the law? They already have. Affirmative action is dying. Will we go one step further and lose the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that bans discrimination in employment practices and public accommodations; the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which protects voting rights; and the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which bans discrimination in the sale or rental of housing? I don’t know but I don’t think embracing class instead of race in programs to increase participation will resolve these difficult issues. Our experiences are so different - white and black. It is hard to imagine that we can come together without far more understanding on the part of white people. Richard Wright in Black Boy (1993) wrote about two white waitresses he worked with every day – “They knew nothing of hate and fear….They lived on the surface of their days; their smiles were surface smiles, their tears were surface tears….We shared a common tongue but my language was a different language from theirs. It was a psychological distance that separated the races… For these poor ignorant white girls to have understood my life would have meant nothing short of a vast revolution in theirs” (319).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Free Trade?

What is free trade? Free trade means that nations agree to trade goods and services without government interference – no tariffs, no underlying government regulation. The concept of free trade is supported by mainstream economics (neoclassical) which assumes that there is a level playing field worldwide; that free trade means governments do not help the private sector.

However, we know that is not the case. China’s government has put enormous investment in certain of its industries. One example is solar energy. China’s government has invested in this industry with the result that China now leads the world in the production of solar panels. There are dozens of examples of governments investing in private companies to help them in the tough worldwide competition that has developed.

America companies who put their manufacturing plants in China benefit enormous. It is called the “free rider.”  American companies with manufacturing plants keep reaping all the rewards of selling…

Mayor de Blasio admits homelessness cannot be eliminated immediately.

After three years of blaming his predecessor, Mayor Bloomberg, for moving so slowly on housing the homeless, Mayor de Blasio finally admitted that it will take years to house so many homeless people. Perhaps it isn't all Mayor Bloomberg's fault.
   To add a different perspective, let us take a look at New York State and its inability to commit resources to the city's problem. During the Bloomberg administration, the state cut funding to the homeless from $164 million in FY2002 to $110 million in FY2012, a 33 percent cut.  In addition, the state cut the funding to one of the few programs to permanently house the homeless, the Advantage Program. Not only did the state cut the program, but the state also passed legislation that the city could not use other state funds for the program.
   Then of course there is the federal government that has cut millions of dollars out of the public housing budget that houses so many of people in poverty. Thanks to the federal government, t…